| 💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✅ PASS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 17 | 29 | 573 | 32 | 506 |
| 1% | 2% | 3% | 65% | 4% | 57% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'
The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'
Failed to access: http://namecheck.fontdata.com. This check relies on the external service http://namecheck.fontdata.com via the internet. While the service cannot be reached or does not respond this check is broken.
You can exclude this check with the command line option:
-x com.google.fonts/check/fontdata_namecheck
Or you can wait until the service is available again.
If the problem persists please report this issue at: https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues
Original error message:
<class 'requests.exceptions.ReadTimeout'> [code: namecheck-service]
The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'
The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Vithkuqi Medium' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Vithkuqi SemiBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
Not all fonts passed in the command line are in the same directory. This may lead to bad results as the tool will interpret all font files as belonging to a single font family. The detected directories are: ['fonts/NotoSansVithkuqi/googlefonts/ttf', 'fonts/NotoSansVithkuqi/googlefonts/variable-ttf'] [code: single-directory]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- NULL
- uni00A0.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- NULL
- uni00A0.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- NULL
- uni00A0.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- NULL
- uni00A0.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- NULL
- uni00A0.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
No dotted circle glyph presentand font uses a complex shaper [code: missing-dotted-circle-complex]
No dotted circle glyph presentand font uses a complex shaper [code: missing-dotted-circle-complex]
No dotted circle glyph presentand font uses a complex shaper [code: missing-dotted-circle-complex]
No dotted circle glyph presentand font uses a complex shaper [code: missing-dotted-circle-complex]
No dotted circle glyph presentand font uses a complex shaper [code: missing-dotted-circle-complex]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̦̀ į̦́ į̦̂ į̦̃ į̦̄ į̦̆ į̦̇ į̦̈ į̦̊ į̦̋ į̦̌ į̦̒ į̧̀ į̧́ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̦̀ į̦́ į̦̂ į̦̃ į̦̄ į̦̆ į̦̇ į̦̈ į̦̊ į̦̋ į̦̌ į̦̒ į̧̀ į̧́ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̦̀ į̦́ į̦̂ į̦̃ į̦̄ į̦̆ į̦̇ į̦̈ į̦̊ į̦̋ į̦̌ į̦̒ į̧̀ į̧́ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̦̀ į̦́ į̦̂ į̦̃ į̦̄ į̦̆ į̦̇ į̦̈ į̦̊ į̦̋ į̦̌ į̦̒ į̧̀ į̧́ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̦̀ į̦́ į̦̂ į̦̃ į̦̄ į̦̆ į̦̇ į̦̈ į̦̊ į̦̋ į̦̌ į̦̒ į̧̀ į̧́ [code: soft-dotted]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
Family 'Noto Sans Vithkuqi' has 2 fonts (should be no more than 1) with the same OS/2.fsSelection bold & italic settings: Bold=False, Italic=False [code: unique-fsselection]
The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:
* numbersign (U+0023): X=236.0,Y=713.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* numbersign (U+0023): X=343.0,Y=713.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* numbersign (U+0023): X=440.0,Y=713.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* numbersign (U+0023): X=545.0,Y=713.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* six (U+0036): X=489.0,Y=715.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* C (U+0043): X=482.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
* G (U+0047): X=527.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
* G (U+0047): X=543.0,Y=712.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* a (U+0061): X=190.5,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 546?)
* c (U+0063): X=410.5,Y=545.0 (should be at x-height 546?)
* 84 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* W (U+0057): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* W (U+0057): B<<489.0,505.5>-<485.0,529.0>-<483.0,542.0>>/B<<483.0,542.0>-<482.0,529.0>-<477.5,505.5>> = 13.144867617550734
* W (U+0057): B<<683.0,196.0>-<689.0,161.0>-<692.0,137.0>>/B<<692.0,137.0>-<695.0,162.0>-<701.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<489.0,505.5>-<485.0,529.0>-<483.0,542.0>>/B<<483.0,542.0>-<482.0,529.0>-<477.5,505.5>> = 13.144867617550734
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<683.0,196.0>-<689.0,161.0>-<692.0,137.0>>/B<<692.0,137.0>-<695.0,162.0>-<701.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<489.0,505.5>-<485.0,529.0>-<483.0,542.0>>/B<<483.0,542.0>-<482.0,529.0>-<477.5,505.5>> = 13.144867617550734
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<683.0,196.0>-<689.0,161.0>-<692.0,137.0>>/B<<692.0,137.0>-<695.0,162.0>-<701.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* 5 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* Cevit (U+10573): B<<223.0,123.0>-<271.0,180.0>-<353.0,243.0>>/L<<353.0,243.0>--<343.0,235.0>> = 1.1249991102113133 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* W (U+0057): B<<257.0,182.5>-<263.0,150.0>-<266.0,126.0>>/B<<266.0,126.0>-<269.0,151.0>-<275.0,184.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* W (U+0057): B<<678.0,182.0>-<684.0,150.0>-<687.0,126.0>>/B<<687.0,126.0>-<690.0,151.0>-<695.5,183.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<257.0,182.5>-<263.0,150.0>-<266.0,126.0>>/B<<266.0,126.0>-<269.0,151.0>-<275.0,184.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<678.0,182.0>-<684.0,150.0>-<687.0,126.0>>/B<<687.0,126.0>-<690.0,151.0>-<695.5,183.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<257.0,182.5>-<263.0,150.0>-<266.0,126.0>>/B<<266.0,126.0>-<269.0,151.0>-<275.0,184.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<678.0,182.0>-<684.0,150.0>-<687.0,126.0>>/B<<687.0,126.0>-<690.0,151.0>-<695.5,183.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<257.0,182.5>-<263.0,150.0>-<266.0,126.0>>/B<<266.0,126.0>-<269.0,151.0>-<275.0,184.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<678.0,182.0>-<684.0,150.0>-<687.0,126.0>>/B<<687.0,126.0>-<690.0,151.0>-<695.5,183.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wgrave (U+1E80): B<<257.0,182.5>-<263.0,150.0>-<266.0,126.0>>/B<<266.0,126.0>-<269.0,151.0>-<275.0,184.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wgrave (U+1E80): B<<678.0,182.0>-<684.0,150.0>-<687.0,126.0>>/B<<687.0,126.0>-<690.0,151.0>-<695.5,183.0>> = 13.967789761532726 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* Bbevit (U+10571): L<<509.0,-90.0>--<508.0,202.0>>
* Bbevit (U+10571): L<<661.0,209.0>--<660.0,-72.0>>
* Fevit (U+10579): L<<122.0,214.0>--<121.0,526.0>>
* Fevit (U+10579): L<<279.0,574.0>--<280.0,234.0>>
* Jevit (U+10580): L<<509.0,-90.0>--<508.0,135.0>>
* Jevit (U+10580): L<<661.0,142.0>--<660.0,-72.0>>
* Revit (U+1058A): L<<122.0,214.0>--<121.0,655.0>>
* Revit (U+1058A): L<<279.0,703.0>--<280.0,234.0>>
* Sevit (U+1058C): L<<122.0,214.0>--<121.0,526.0>>
* Sevit (U+1058C): L<<279.0,574.0>--<280.0,234.0>>
* 6 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* Bbevit (U+10571): L<<603.0,220.0>--<602.0,-55.0>>
* Jevit (U+10580): L<<603.0,198.0>--<602.0,-55.0>>
* Uvit (U+10590): L<<519.0,713.0>--<714.0,714.0>>
* Xevit (U+10592): L<<546.0,333.0>--<359.0,334.0>>
* Yvit (U+10594): L<<519.0,713.0>--<714.0,714.0>>
* bbevit (U+10598): L<<412.0,133.0>--<411.0,291.0>>
* bbevit (U+10598): L<<519.0,305.0>--<520.0,158.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* Uvit (U+10590): L<<522.0,713.0>--<702.0,714.0>>
* Yvit (U+10594): L<<522.0,713.0>--<702.0,714.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* Bbevit (U+10571): L<<631.0,215.0>--<630.0,-63.0>>
* Fevit (U+10579): L<<121.0,216.0>--<120.0,547.0>>
* Jevit (U+10580): L<<631.0,171.0>--<630.0,-63.0>>
* Revit (U+1058A): L<<121.0,216.0>--<120.0,677.0>>
* Sevit (U+1058C): L<<121.0,216.0>--<120.0,547.0>>
* Shevit (U+1058D): L<<121.0,216.0>--<120.0,547.0>>
* Uvit (U+10590): L<<516.0,713.0>--<726.0,714.0>>
* Vevit (U+10591): L<<121.0,272.0>--<120.0,547.0>>
* Yvit (U+10594): L<<516.0,713.0>--<726.0,714.0>>
* ijevit (U+105A6): L<<219.0,542.0>--<218.0,170.0>>
* ivit (U+105A5): L<<208.0,542.0>--<207.0,170.0>>
* jevit (U+105A7): L<<417.0,136.0>--<416.0,259.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]