| 💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✅ PASS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 25 | 70 | 1416 | 74 | 1180 |
| 0% | 1% | 3% | 66% | 3% | 55% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh APT' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh Adrar' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh Agraw Imazighen' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh Ahaggar' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh Air' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh Azawagh' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh Ghat' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh Hawad' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh Rhissa Ixa' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh SIL' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Tifinagh Tawellemmet' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 84 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 84 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 84 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 84 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 85 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 85 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 85 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 85 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 84 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 84 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 84 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- labializationBerbertifi
- uni00A0.1
- yaBerbertifi
- yaHawadtifi
- yaSILtifi
- yaaBerbertifi
- yabBerbertifi
- yachAPTtifi
- yachBerbertifi
- yachHawadtifi
- 84 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: unreachable-glyphs]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̆ į̇ į̈ į̉ į̊ į̋ į̒ į̣̀ į̣́ į̣̂ į̣̃ į̣̄ į̣̆ į̣̇ į̣̈ į̣̉ į̣̊ į̣̋ į̣̌ į̣̒ [code: soft-dotted]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
12 different Font Family names were found:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh APT' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh Adrar' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh Agraw Imazighen' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh Ahaggar' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh Air' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh Azawagh' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh Ghat' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh Hawad' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh Rhissa Ixa' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh SIL' was found in:
'Noto Sans Tifinagh Tawellemmet' was found in:
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 89 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 77 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 83 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 85 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 85 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 85 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 85 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 85 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 89 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 81 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* 77 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]