Fontbakery Technical Report

Version number 2.0030059814453125 is equal to version on Google Fonts.

Version number 2.0030059814453125 is equal to version on Google Fonts GitHub repo.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * hiitamil * jiitamil * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * kutamil * kuutamil * lliitamil and 75 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * cuutamil * four * hiitamil * jiitamil * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * kutamil and 76 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * hiitamil * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * kutamil * lliitamil * llliitamil * lllutamil and 54 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * cuutamil * four * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * kutamil * kuutamil * lliitamil and 55 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * hiitamil * jiitamil * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * kutamil * kuutamil * lliitamil and 61 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * cuutamil * four * hiitamil * jiitamil * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * kutamil and 65 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * vutamil and vuutamil

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * kssiitamil * vutamil and vuutamil

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * lliitamil * llliitamil * llluutamil * llutamil * lluutamil and 36 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * kssatamil * kssiitamil * lliitamil * llliitamil * llutamil * lluutamil * nniitamil * nnniitamil * nnutamil * nnuutamil and 8 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * kssatamil * kssiitamil * lliitamil * llutamil * lluutamil * nniitamil * nnniitamil * nnutamil * nnuutamil * nyiitamil and 7 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * kutamil * lliitamil * llliitamil * lllutamil * llluutamil and 42 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * four * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * kutamil * lliitamil * llliitamil * lllutamil and 41 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * lliitamil * llliitamil * llluutamil * llutamil * lluutamil and 36 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * kutamil * lliitamil * llliitamil * lllutamil * llluutamil and 50 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * Euro * ciitamil * cuutamil * four * kiitamil * kssatamil * kssiitamil * kutamil * kuutamil * lliitamil and 49 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.

The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'

The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'

The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'

The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'

The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'

The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil Black' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil Black' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil ExtraBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil ExtraBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil Light' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil Light' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil Medium' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil Medium' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil SemiBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil SemiBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif Tamil Thin' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]

Not all fonts passed in the command line are in the same directory. This may lead to bad results as the tool will interpret all font files as belonging to a single font family. The detected directories are: ['fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf', 'fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/variable-ttf'] [code: single-directory]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1178, but got 1069 instead [code: ascent]

OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 635, but got 492 instead. [code: descent]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- uni00A0.1

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0 

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

[code: contour-count]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ [code: soft-dotted]

Version info differs among font files of the same font project. These were the version values found:

• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-Black.ttf: 2.003997802734375
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-BlackItalic.ttf: 2.0030059814453125
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-Bold.ttf: 2.003997802734375
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-BoldItalic.ttf: 2.0030059814453125
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-ExtraBold.ttf: 2.003997802734375
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-ExtraBoldItalic.ttf: 2.0030059814453125
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-ExtraLight.ttf: 2.003997802734375
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-ExtraLightItalic.ttf: 2.0030059814453125
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-Italic.ttf: 2.0030059814453125
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-Light.ttf: 2.003997802734375
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-LightItalic.ttf: 2.0030059814453125
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-Medium.ttf: 2.003997802734375
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-MediumItalic.ttf: 2.0030059814453125
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-Regular.ttf: 2.003997802734375
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-SemiBold.ttf: 2.003997802734375
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-SemiBoldItalic.ttf: 2.0030059814453125
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-Thin.ttf: 2.003997802734375
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/ttf/NotoSerifTamil-ThinItalic.ttf: 2.0030059814453125
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/variable-ttf/NotoSerifTamil-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf: 2.0030059814453125
• fonts/NotoSerifTamil/googlefonts/variable-ttf/NotoSerifTamil[wdth,wght].ttf: 2.003997802734375 [code: mismatch]

Family 'Noto Serif Tamil' has 2 fonts (should be no more than 1) with the same OS/2.fsSelection bold & italic settings: Bold=False, Italic=True [code: unique-fsselection]

Family 'Noto Serif Tamil' has 2 fonts (should be no more than 1) with the same OS/2.fsSelection bold & italic settings: Bold=False, Italic=False [code: unique-fsselection]

Family 'Noto Serif Tamil' has 6 fonts (should be 4 or fewer). [code: too-many]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: uni0BBE (U+0BBE), uni0BBF (U+0BBF), uni0BBF.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BBF.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC1 (U+0BC1), uni0BC1.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC1.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BC2 (U+0BC2), uni0BC2.alt01 (unencoded), uni0BC2.alt02 (unencoded), uni0BD7 (U+0BD7) and uniA8F3 (U+A8F3) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+0BBE, U+0BBF, U+0BC1, U+0BC2, U+0BD7 and U+A8F3 [code: non-mark-chars]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* at (U+0040): X=765.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* J (U+004A): X=117.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* J (U+004A): X=317.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Q (U+0051): X=317.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* p (U+0070): X=337.5,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* q (U+0071): X=386.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* t (U+0074): X=367.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=329.5,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=469.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* questiondown (U+00BF): X=480.5,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 36 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* exclam (U+0021): X=233.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* period (U+002E): X=183.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* three (U+0033): X=335.5,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* colon (U+003A): X=196.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* question (U+003F): X=262.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* at (U+0040): X=765.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* J (U+004A): X=117.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* J (U+004A): X=317.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Q (U+0051): X=317.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* p (U+0070): X=337.5,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 38 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* three (U+0033): X=343.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* five (U+0035): X=336.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* J (U+004A): X=281.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* a (U+0061): X=265.0,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* t (U+0074): X=119.0,Y=561.0 (should be at x-height 563?)

* t (U+0074): X=332.5,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Acircumflex (U+00C2): X=380.0,Y=861.0 (should be at cap-height 863?)

* Ecircumflex (U+00CA): X=318.0,Y=861.0 (should be at cap-height 863?)

* Icircumflex (U+00CE): X=200.0,Y=861.0 (should be at cap-height 863?)

* Ocircumflex (U+00D4): X=392.0,Y=861.0 (should be at cap-height 863?) 

* 28 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* three (U+0033): X=313.5,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* J (U+004A): X=281.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* a (U+0061): X=265.0,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* t (U+0074): X=119.0,Y=561.0 (should be at x-height 563?)

* t (U+0074): X=332.5,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* braceleft (U+007B): X=251.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Acircumflex (U+00C2): X=380.0,Y=861.0 (should be at cap-height 863?)

* Ecircumflex (U+00CA): X=318.0,Y=861.0 (should be at cap-height 863?)

* Icircumflex (U+00CE): X=200.0,Y=861.0 (should be at cap-height 863?)

* Ocircumflex (U+00D4): X=392.0,Y=861.0 (should be at cap-height 863?) 

* 21 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* three (U+0033): X=348.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* J (U+004A): X=120.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Q (U+0051): X=319.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Q (U+0051): X=509.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* bracketleft (U+005B): X=274.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* bracketright (U+005D): X=162.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* p (U+0070): X=265.0,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* t (U+0074): X=351.0,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* y (U+0079): X=353.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* yacute (U+00FD): X=353.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 32 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* exclam (U+0021): X=217.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* period (U+002E): X=171.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* three (U+0033): X=325.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* colon (U+003A): X=182.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* question (U+003F): X=256.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* J (U+004A): X=120.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Q (U+0051): X=319.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Q (U+0051): X=509.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* bracketright (U+005D): X=96.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* p (U+0070): X=265.0,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 35 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* G (U+0047): X=486.5,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* a (U+0061): X=248.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* b (U+0062): X=327.0,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* c (U+0063): X=265.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* d (U+0064): X=257.0,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* e (U+0065): X=261.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* g (U+0067): X=251.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* g (U+0067): X=487.5,Y=545.5 (should be at x-height 545?)

* h (U+0068): X=322.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* m (U+006D): X=330.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?) 

* 43 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* G (U+0047): X=486.5,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* a (U+0061): X=248.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* b (U+0062): X=327.0,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* c (U+0063): X=265.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* d (U+0064): X=257.0,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* e (U+0065): X=261.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* g (U+0067): X=251.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* g (U+0067): X=487.5,Y=545.5 (should be at x-height 545?)

* h (U+0068): X=322.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?)

* m (U+006D): X=330.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 545?) 

* 45 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* parenright (U+0029): X=69.5,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* comma (U+002C): X=68.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* three (U+0033): X=286.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* semicolon (U+003B): X=88.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* G (U+0047): X=519.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* g (U+0067): X=161.0,Y=-0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* q (U+0071): X=412.5,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=77.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* section (U+00A7): X=101.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Gbreve (U+011E): X=519.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 18 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* three (U+0033): X=342.5,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* nine (U+0039): X=147.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* g (U+0067): X=498.0,Y=548.0 (should be at x-height 549?)

* t (U+0074): X=89.0,Y=551.0 (should be at x-height 549?)

* t (U+0074): X=297.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* y (U+0079): X=269.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=354.5,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=79.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=460.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* aring (U+00E5): X=267.0,Y=814.0 (should be at cap-height 812?) 

* 29 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* g (U+0067): X=498.0,Y=548.0 (should be at x-height 549?)

* t (U+0074): X=89.0,Y=551.0 (should be at x-height 549?)

* t (U+0074): X=297.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* y (U+0079): X=269.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=354.5,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=79.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=460.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* aring (U+00E5): X=267.0,Y=814.0 (should be at cap-height 812?)

* yacute (U+00FD): X=269.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* ydieresis (U+00FF): X=269.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 25 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* three (U+0033): X=337.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* G (U+0047): X=527.5,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* a (U+0061): X=271.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* g (U+0067): X=316.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* g (U+0067): X=213.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* h (U+0068): X=216.0,Y=555.0 (should be at x-height 556?)

* q (U+0071): X=408.5,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* t (U+0074): X=103.0,Y=554.0 (should be at x-height 556?)

* y (U+0079): X=259.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=78.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 44 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* three (U+0033): X=293.5,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* G (U+0047): X=527.5,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* a (U+0061): X=271.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* g (U+0067): X=316.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* g (U+0067): X=213.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* h (U+0068): X=216.0,Y=555.0 (should be at x-height 556?)

* q (U+0071): X=408.5,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* t (U+0074): X=103.0,Y=554.0 (should be at x-height 556?)

* y (U+0079): X=259.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=78.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 53 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* comma (U+002C): X=114.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* three (U+0033): X=334.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* nine (U+0039): X=139.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* semicolon (U+003B): X=132.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* G (U+0047): X=519.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* g (U+0067): X=161.0,Y=-0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* q (U+0071): X=412.5,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=77.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* section (U+00A7): X=101.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Gbreve (U+011E): X=519.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 17 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* comma (U+002C): X=119.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* three (U+0033): X=340.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* semicolon (U+003B): X=132.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Q (U+0051): X=470.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* y (U+0079): X=254.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* y (U+0079): X=343.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Aring (U+00C5): X=285.0,Y=851.5 (should be at cap-height 850?)

* Aring (U+00C5): X=455.0,Y=851.5 (should be at cap-height 850?)

* yacute (U+00FD): X=254.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* yacute (U+00FD): X=343.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 29 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* three (U+0033): X=303.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Q (U+0051): X=470.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* y (U+0079): X=254.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* y (U+0079): X=343.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* braceleft (U+007B): X=103.5,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* Aring (U+00C5): X=285.0,Y=851.5 (should be at cap-height 850?)

* Aring (U+00C5): X=455.0,Y=851.5 (should be at cap-height 850?)

* yacute (U+00FD): X=254.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* yacute (U+00FD): X=343.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* ydieresis (U+00FF): X=254.0,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 28 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* comma (U+002C): X=99.5,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* semicolon (U+003B): X=111.5,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* C (U+0043): X=407.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* G (U+0047): X=477.5,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* b (U+0062): X=320.0,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 542?)

* d (U+0064): X=256.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 542?)

* d (U+0064): X=432.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 542?)

* g (U+0067): X=481.0,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 542?)

* r (U+0072): X=306.0,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 542?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=362.5,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 32 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* parenright (U+0029): X=65.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* C (U+0043): X=407.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* G (U+0047): X=477.5,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* b (U+0062): X=320.0,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 542?)

* d (U+0064): X=256.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 542?)

* d (U+0064): X=432.0,Y=543.0 (should be at x-height 542?)

* g (U+0067): X=481.0,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 542?)

* r (U+0072): X=306.0,Y=544.0 (should be at x-height 542?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=362.5,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* sterling (U+00A3): X=464.5,Y=-0.5 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 23 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* exclam (U+0021): X=151.0,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* parenright (U+0029): X=69.5,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* comma (U+002C): X=68.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* period (U+002E): X=117.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* three (U+0033): X=286.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* colon (U+003A): X=123.0,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* semicolon (U+003B): X=88.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* question (U+003F): X=227.0,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* C (U+0043): X=457.5,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* G (U+0047): X=519.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 49 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:

* comma (U+002C): X=114.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* three (U+0033): X=334.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* five (U+0035): X=328.0,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* nine (U+0039): X=139.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* semicolon (U+003B): X=132.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)

* C (U+0043): X=457.5,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* G (U+0047): X=519.0,Y=1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* g (U+0067): X=161.0,Y=-0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* q (U+0071): X=412.5,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)

* s (U+0073): X=123.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?) 

* 50 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni0B95 (U+0B95): L<<253.0,348.0>--<256.0,348.0>> -> L<<256.0,348.0>--<391.0,348.0>>

* uni0B9A (U+0B9A): L<<253.0,348.0>--<259.0,348.0>> -> L<<259.0,348.0>--<391.0,348.0>>

* uni0BE7 (U+0BE7): L<<253.0,348.0>--<256.0,348.0>> -> L<<256.0,348.0>--<391.0,348.0>>

* uni0BEA (U+0BEA): L<<253.0,348.0>--<259.0,348.0>> -> L<<259.0,348.0>--<391.0,348.0>>

* uni0BEC (U+0BEC): L<<253.0,348.0>--<259.0,348.0>> -> L<<259.0,348.0>--<391.0,348.0>> 

* uni0BEF (U+0BEF): L<<253.0,348.0>--<259.0,348.0>> -> L<<259.0,348.0>--<391.0,348.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni0B95 (U+0B95): L<<250.0,331.0>--<253.0,331.0>> -> L<<253.0,331.0>--<391.0,331.0>>

* uni0B9A (U+0B9A): L<<250.0,331.0>--<253.0,331.0>> -> L<<253.0,331.0>--<391.0,331.0>>

* uni0BA4 (U+0BA4): L<<250.0,331.0>--<253.0,331.0>> -> L<<253.0,331.0>--<391.0,331.0>>

* uni0BB4 (U+0BB4): L<<630.0,399.0>--<572.0,122.0>> -> L<<572.0,122.0>--<559.0,61.0>>

* uni0BE7 (U+0BE7): L<<250.0,331.0>--<253.0,331.0>> -> L<<253.0,331.0>--<391.0,331.0>>

* uni0BEA (U+0BEA): L<<250.0,331.0>--<253.0,331.0>> -> L<<253.0,331.0>--<391.0,331.0>>

* uni0BEB (U+0BEB): L<<723.0,194.0>--<721.0,184.0>> -> L<<721.0,184.0>--<715.0,152.0>>

* uni0BEC (U+0BEC): L<<250.0,331.0>--<253.0,331.0>> -> L<<253.0,331.0>--<391.0,331.0>>

* uni0BEF (U+0BEF): L<<250.0,331.0>--<253.0,331.0>> -> L<<253.0,331.0>--<391.0,331.0>> 

* uni0BF2 (U+0BF2): L<<256.0,331.0>--<259.0,331.0>> -> L<<259.0,331.0>--<397.0,331.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni0BF8 (U+0BF8): L<<1781.0,69.0>--<1781.0,69.0>> -> L<<1781.0,69.0>--<1789.0,69.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni0B95 (U+0B95): L<<257.0,340.0>--<258.0,340.0>> -> L<<258.0,340.0>--<395.0,340.0>>

* uni0B9A (U+0B9A): L<<257.0,340.0>--<258.0,340.0>> -> L<<258.0,340.0>--<395.0,340.0>>

* uni0BA4 (U+0BA4): L<<257.0,340.0>--<258.0,340.0>> -> L<<258.0,340.0>--<395.0,340.0>>

* uni0BE7 (U+0BE7): L<<257.0,340.0>--<258.0,340.0>> -> L<<258.0,340.0>--<395.0,340.0>>

* uni0BEA (U+0BEA): L<<257.0,340.0>--<258.0,340.0>> -> L<<258.0,340.0>--<395.0,340.0>>

* uni0BEC (U+0BEC): L<<257.0,340.0>--<258.0,340.0>> -> L<<258.0,340.0>--<395.0,340.0>>

* uni0BEF (U+0BEF): L<<257.0,340.0>--<258.0,340.0>> -> L<<258.0,340.0>--<395.0,340.0>> 

* uni0BF2 (U+0BF2): L<<264.0,340.0>--<264.0,340.0>> -> L<<264.0,340.0>--<401.0,340.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni0BEB (U+0BEB): L<<586.0,175.0>--<584.0,165.0>> -> L<<584.0,165.0>--<581.0,151.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni0BF9 (U+0BF9): L<<664.0,197.0>--<659.0,171.0>> -> L<<659.0,171.0>--<652.0,138.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni0BB4 (U+0BB4): L<<465.0,74.0>--<463.0,64.0>> -> L<<463.0,64.0>--<458.0,40.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni0BB4 (U+0BB4): L<<576.0,395.0>--<515.0,103.0>> -> L<<515.0,103.0>--<505.0,56.0>>

* uni0BF0 (U+0BF0): L<<334.0,158.0>--<347.0,216.0>> -> L<<347.0,216.0>--<419.0,556.0>> 

* uni0BF9 (U+0BF9): L<<684.0,195.0>--<678.0,167.0>> -> L<<678.0,167.0>--<673.0,142.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni0BB4 (U+0BB4): L<<602.0,397.0>--<542.0,112.0>> -> L<<542.0,112.0>--<531.0,58.0>>

* uni0BEB (U+0BEB): L<<697.0,199.0>--<689.0,164.0>> -> L<<689.0,164.0>--<686.0,147.0>> 

* uni0BF9 (U+0BF9): L<<710.0,193.0>--<702.0,159.0>> -> L<<702.0,159.0>--<700.0,147.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* V (U+0056): B<<402.5,227.0>-<406.0,208.0>-<407.0,194.0>>/B<<407.0,194.0>-<409.0,211.0>-<416.0,238.5>> = 10.79545358773178

* eogonek (U+0119): B<<282.5,-58.0>-<309.0,-25.0>-<346.0,-9.0>>/B<<346.0,-9.0>-<340.0,-10.0>-<333.5,-10.0>> = 13.922898849188117

* y (U+0079): B<<336.0,187.0>-<342.0,160.0>-<343.0,142.0>>/B<<343.0,142.0>-<346.0,164.0>-<349.5,180.0>> = 10.944996138289511

* yacute (U+00FD): B<<336.0,187.0>-<342.0,160.0>-<343.0,142.0>>/B<<343.0,142.0>-<346.0,164.0>-<349.5,180.0>> = 10.944996138289511

* ycircumflex (U+0177): B<<336.0,187.0>-<342.0,160.0>-<343.0,142.0>>/B<<343.0,142.0>-<346.0,164.0>-<349.5,180.0>> = 10.944996138289511

* ydieresis (U+00FF): B<<336.0,187.0>-<342.0,160.0>-<343.0,142.0>>/B<<343.0,142.0>-<346.0,164.0>-<349.5,180.0>> = 10.944996138289511 

* ygrave (U+1EF3): B<<336.0,187.0>-<342.0,160.0>-<343.0,142.0>>/B<<343.0,142.0>-<346.0,164.0>-<349.5,180.0>> = 10.944996138289511 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* V (U+0056): B<<402.5,227.0>-<406.0,208.0>-<407.0,194.0>>/B<<407.0,194.0>-<409.0,211.0>-<416.0,238.5>> = 10.79545358773178

* eogonek (U+0119): B<<282.5,-58.0>-<309.0,-25.0>-<346.0,-9.0>>/B<<346.0,-9.0>-<340.0,-10.0>-<333.5,-10.0>> = 13.922898849188117

* y (U+0079): B<<336.0,187.0>-<342.0,160.0>-<343.0,142.0>>/B<<343.0,142.0>-<346.0,164.0>-<349.5,180.0>> = 10.944996138289511

* yacute (U+00FD): B<<336.0,187.0>-<342.0,160.0>-<343.0,142.0>>/B<<343.0,142.0>-<346.0,164.0>-<349.5,180.0>> = 10.944996138289511

* ycircumflex (U+0177): B<<336.0,187.0>-<342.0,160.0>-<343.0,142.0>>/B<<343.0,142.0>-<346.0,164.0>-<349.5,180.0>> = 10.944996138289511

* ydieresis (U+00FF): B<<336.0,187.0>-<342.0,160.0>-<343.0,142.0>>/B<<343.0,142.0>-<346.0,164.0>-<349.5,180.0>> = 10.944996138289511 

* ygrave (U+1EF3): B<<336.0,187.0>-<342.0,160.0>-<343.0,142.0>>/B<<343.0,142.0>-<346.0,164.0>-<349.5,180.0>> = 10.944996138289511 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni0B90 (U+0B90): B<<585.5,-212.0>-<571.0,-183.0>-<568.0,-158.0>>/B<<568.0,-158.0>-<561.0,-220.0>-<526.0,-256.5>> = 13.284373511965962

* uni0B99 (U+0B99): B<<661.0,87.0>-<631.0,67.0>-<602.0,61.0>>/L<<602.0,61.0>--<842.0,61.0>> = 11.689369175439202

* uni0BB8 (U+0BB8): B<<590.0,515.5>-<670.0,462.0>-<692.0,360.0>>/L<<692.0,360.0>--<692.0,407.0>> = 12.171458208587458

* uni0BE9 (U+0BE9): B<<651.5,87.0>-<621.0,67.0>-<592.0,61.0>>/L<<592.0,61.0>--<918.0,61.0>> = 11.689369175439202

* y (U+0079): B<<321.0,162.0>-<327.0,138.0>-<329.0,118.0>>/B<<329.0,118.0>-<331.0,139.0>-<339.5,165.0>> = 11.150925168505127

* yacute (U+00FD): B<<321.0,162.0>-<327.0,138.0>-<329.0,118.0>>/B<<329.0,118.0>-<331.0,139.0>-<339.5,165.0>> = 11.150925168505127

* ycircumflex (U+0177): B<<321.0,162.0>-<327.0,138.0>-<329.0,118.0>>/B<<329.0,118.0>-<331.0,139.0>-<339.5,165.0>> = 11.150925168505127

* ydieresis (U+00FF): B<<321.0,162.0>-<327.0,138.0>-<329.0,118.0>>/B<<329.0,118.0>-<331.0,139.0>-<339.5,165.0>> = 11.150925168505127 

* ygrave (U+1EF3): B<<321.0,162.0>-<327.0,138.0>-<329.0,118.0>>/B<<329.0,118.0>-<331.0,139.0>-<339.5,165.0>> = 11.150925168505127 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni0B90 (U+0B90): B<<481.0,-212.0>-<471.0,-183.0>-<473.0,-158.0>>/B<<473.0,-158.0>-<453.0,-220.0>-<413.0,-256.5>> = 13.304775335940452

* y (U+0079): B<<321.0,162.0>-<327.0,138.0>-<329.0,118.0>>/B<<329.0,118.0>-<331.0,139.0>-<339.5,165.0>> = 11.150925168505127

* yacute (U+00FD): B<<321.0,162.0>-<327.0,138.0>-<329.0,118.0>>/B<<329.0,118.0>-<331.0,139.0>-<339.5,165.0>> = 11.150925168505127

* ycircumflex (U+0177): B<<321.0,162.0>-<327.0,138.0>-<329.0,118.0>>/B<<329.0,118.0>-<331.0,139.0>-<339.5,165.0>> = 11.150925168505127

* ydieresis (U+00FF): B<<321.0,162.0>-<327.0,138.0>-<329.0,118.0>>/B<<329.0,118.0>-<331.0,139.0>-<339.5,165.0>> = 11.150925168505127 

* ygrave (U+1EF3): B<<321.0,162.0>-<327.0,138.0>-<329.0,118.0>>/B<<329.0,118.0>-<331.0,139.0>-<339.5,165.0>> = 11.150925168505127 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* eogonek (U+0119): B<<270.5,-58.5>-<297.0,-26.0>-<333.0,-9.0>>/B<<333.0,-9.0>-<329.0,-10.0>-<324.0,-10.0>> = 11.24147876762648

* uni0B99 (U+0B99): B<<692.0,100.5>-<659.0,78.0>-<623.0,69.0>>/L<<623.0,69.0>--<852.0,69.0>> = 14.036243467926484

* uni0BE9 (U+0BE9): B<<688.5,100.5>-<656.0,78.0>-<620.0,69.0>>/L<<620.0,69.0>--<946.0,69.0>> = 14.036243467926484

* y (U+0079): B<<329.0,175.5>-<335.0,150.0>-<337.0,131.0>>/B<<337.0,131.0>-<339.0,153.0>-<345.0,173.0>> = 11.203434865229296

* yacute (U+00FD): B<<329.0,175.5>-<335.0,150.0>-<337.0,131.0>>/B<<337.0,131.0>-<339.0,153.0>-<345.0,173.0>> = 11.203434865229296

* ycircumflex (U+0177): B<<329.0,175.5>-<335.0,150.0>-<337.0,131.0>>/B<<337.0,131.0>-<339.0,153.0>-<345.0,173.0>> = 11.203434865229296

* ydieresis (U+00FF): B<<329.0,175.5>-<335.0,150.0>-<337.0,131.0>>/B<<337.0,131.0>-<339.0,153.0>-<345.0,173.0>> = 11.203434865229296 

* ygrave (U+1EF3): B<<329.0,175.5>-<335.0,150.0>-<337.0,131.0>>/B<<337.0,131.0>-<339.0,153.0>-<345.0,173.0>> = 11.203434865229296 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* eogonek (U+0119): B<<270.5,-58.5>-<297.0,-26.0>-<333.0,-9.0>>/B<<333.0,-9.0>-<329.0,-10.0>-<324.0,-10.0>> = 11.24147876762648

* y (U+0079): B<<329.0,175.5>-<335.0,150.0>-<337.0,131.0>>/B<<337.0,131.0>-<339.0,153.0>-<345.0,173.0>> = 11.203434865229296

* yacute (U+00FD): B<<329.0,175.5>-<335.0,150.0>-<337.0,131.0>>/B<<337.0,131.0>-<339.0,153.0>-<345.0,173.0>> = 11.203434865229296

* ycircumflex (U+0177): B<<329.0,175.5>-<335.0,150.0>-<337.0,131.0>>/B<<337.0,131.0>-<339.0,153.0>-<345.0,173.0>> = 11.203434865229296

* ydieresis (U+00FF): B<<329.0,175.5>-<335.0,150.0>-<337.0,131.0>>/B<<337.0,131.0>-<339.0,153.0>-<345.0,173.0>> = 11.203434865229296 

* ygrave (U+1EF3): B<<329.0,175.5>-<335.0,150.0>-<337.0,131.0>>/B<<337.0,131.0>-<339.0,153.0>-<345.0,173.0>> = 11.203434865229296 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* eth (U+00F0): B<<356.5,474.5>-<399.0,456.0>-<423.0,417.0>>/B<<423.0,417.0>-<401.0,487.0>-<370.5,540.5>> = 14.160313822966648 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* eth (U+00F0): B<<356.5,474.5>-<399.0,456.0>-<423.0,417.0>>/B<<423.0,417.0>-<401.0,487.0>-<370.5,540.5>> = 14.160313822966648 

* three (U+0033): B<<427.5,442.5>-<381.0,387.0>-<288.0,375.0>>/B<<288.0,375.0>-<323.0,372.0>-<354.0,353.0>> = 12.251471813680151 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni0B99 (U+0B99): B<<639.0,86.0>-<607.0,63.0>-<572.0,56.0>>/L<<572.0,56.0>--<835.0,56.0>> = 11.309932474020195

* uni0BE9 (U+0BE9): B<<636.0,86.0>-<604.0,63.0>-<569.0,56.0>>/L<<569.0,56.0>--<893.0,56.0>> = 11.309932474020195

* uni2074 (U+2074): B<<198.5,706.5>-<200.0,725.0>-<202.0,743.0>>/B<<202.0,743.0>-<199.0,735.0>-<194.5,726.5>> = 14.21585347367354 

* uni2084 (U+2084): B<<198.5,221.5>-<200.0,240.0>-<202.0,258.0>>/B<<202.0,258.0>-<199.0,250.0>-<194.5,241.5>> = 14.21585347367354 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni2074 (U+2074): B<<276.5,705.5>-<282.0,724.0>-<287.0,743.0>>/B<<287.0,743.0>-<282.0,734.0>-<271.5,721.0>> = 14.311041262606366 

* uni2084 (U+2084): B<<186.5,219.5>-<192.0,238.0>-<197.0,257.0>>/B<<197.0,257.0>-<192.0,248.0>-<181.5,235.0>> = 14.311041262606366 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni0B99 (U+0B99): B<<630.5,86.0>-<598.0,62.0>-<560.0,54.0>>/L<<560.0,54.0>--<832.0,54.0>> = 11.888658039627968 

* uni0BE9 (U+0BE9): B<<630.5,86.0>-<598.0,62.0>-<560.0,54.0>>/L<<560.0,54.0>--<884.0,54.0>> = 11.888658039627968 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni0B99 (U+0B99): B<<649.5,86.5>-<618.0,65.0>-<586.0,58.0>>/L<<586.0,58.0>--<838.0,58.0>> = 12.33908727832618 

* uni0BE9 (U+0BE9): B<<643.5,86.5>-<612.0,65.0>-<580.0,58.0>>/L<<580.0,58.0>--<905.0,58.0>> = 12.33908727832618 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni2074 (U+2074): B<<283.5,703.0>-<289.0,720.0>-<294.0,739.0>>/B<<294.0,739.0>-<289.0,730.0>-<280.5,719.5>> = 14.311041262606366 

* uni2084 (U+2084): B<<193.5,218.0>-<199.0,235.0>-<204.0,254.0>>/B<<204.0,254.0>-<199.0,245.0>-<190.5,234.5>> = 14.311041262606366 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* eth (U+00F0): B<<385.5,450.5>-<412.0,431.0>-<428.0,400.0>>/B<<428.0,400.0>-<403.0,480.0>-<371.5,537.5>> = 9.945547575071476 

* sterling (U+00A3): B<<192.0,89.0>-<173.0,58.0>-<145.0,40.0>>/L<<145.0,40.0>--<149.0,42.0>> = 6.170175095029526 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* eth (U+00F0): B<<385.5,450.5>-<412.0,431.0>-<428.0,400.0>>/B<<428.0,400.0>-<403.0,480.0>-<371.5,537.5>> = 9.945547575071476

* sterling (U+00A3): B<<192.0,89.0>-<173.0,58.0>-<145.0,40.0>>/L<<145.0,40.0>--<149.0,42.0>> = 6.170175095029526 

* three (U+0033): B<<417.0,440.0>-<372.0,385.0>-<280.0,375.0>>/B<<280.0,375.0>-<313.0,372.0>-<343.0,353.0>> = 11.397876809426648 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:

* sterling (U+00A3): L<<454.0,335.0>--<295.0,336.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]

The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:

* h (U+0068): L<<101.0,122.0>--<100.0,646.0>>

* h (U+0068): L<<252.0,309.0>--<253.0,118.0>> 

* sterling (U+00A3): L<<428.0,346.0>--<270.0,347.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]

The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:

* sterling (U+00A3): L<<442.0,340.0>--<284.0,341.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]

The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:

* question (U+003F): L<<200.0,201.0>--<199.0,346.0>> 

* questiondown (U+00BF): L<<203.0,215.0>--<204.0,333.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]

The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:

* sterling (U+00A3): L<<408.0,339.0>--<251.0,340.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]

The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:

* h (U+0068): L<<104.0,119.0>--<103.0,648.0>> 

* h (U+0068): L<<233.0,313.0>--<234.0,115.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]

The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:

* exclam (U+0021): L<<149.0,714.0>--<146.0,167.0>> 

* exclamdown (U+00A1): L<<123.0,-177.0>--<126.0,370.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]