| 💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✔️ PASS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 4 | 71 | 1122 | 62 | 946 |
| 1% | 0% | 4% | 59% | 3% | 50% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * uni13F1 * uni13D0.alt * uni13F1.alt * uni13D0 * uni13F9 and uniABA0
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * uni13D0.alt and uni13D0
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * uni13F1 * uni13D0.alt * uni13F1.alt and uni13D0
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Cherokee Black' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Cherokee ExtraBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Cherokee ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Cherokee Light' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Cherokee Medium' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Cherokee SemiBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Cherokee Thin' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
Not all fonts passed in the command line are in the same directory. This may lead to bad results as the tool will interpret all font files as belonging to a single font family. The detected directories are: ['fonts/NotoSansCherokee/googlefonts/ttf', 'fonts/NotoSansCherokee/googlefonts/variable-ttf'] [code: single-directory]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
PANOSE proportion is not the same across this family. In order to fix this, please make sure that the panose.bProportion value is the same in the OS/2 table of all of this family font files. [code: inconsistency]
PANOSE family type is not the same across this family. In order to fix this, please make sure that the panose.bFamilyType value is the same in the OS/2 table of all of this family font files. [code: inconsistency]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: tildecomb (U+0303), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni0312 (U+0312), uni0326 (U+0326), uni0327 (U+0327) and uni0328 (U+0328) [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: tildecomb (U+0303), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni0312 (U+0312), uni0326 (U+0326), uni0327 (U+0327) and uni0328 (U+0328) [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: tildecomb (U+0303), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni0312 (U+0312), uni0326 (U+0326), uni0327 (U+0327) and uni0328 (U+0328) [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: tildecomb (U+0303), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni0312 (U+0312), uni0326 (U+0326), uni0327 (U+0327) and uni0328 (U+0328) [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: tildecomb (U+0303), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni0312 (U+0312), uni0326 (U+0326), uni0327 (U+0327) and uni0328 (U+0328) [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: tildecomb (U+0303), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni0312 (U+0312), uni0326 (U+0326), uni0327 (U+0327) and uni0328 (U+0328) [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: tildecomb (U+0303), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni0312 (U+0312), uni0326 (U+0326), uni0327 (U+0327) and uni0328 (U+0328) [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: tildecomb (U+0303), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni0312 (U+0312), uni0326 (U+0326), uni0327 (U+0327) and uni0328 (U+0328) [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: tildecomb (U+0303), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni0312 (U+0312), uni0326 (U+0326), uni0327 (U+0327) and uni0328 (U+0328) [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: tildecomb (U+0303), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni0312 (U+0312), uni0326 (U+0326), uni0327 (U+0327) and uni0328 (U+0328) [code: mark-chars]
'Regular' instance has the same coordinates as the default instance; its subfamilyNameID should be either 2 or 17, instead of 270. [code: invalid-default-instance-subfamily-nameid:270]
The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:
* ampersand (U+0026): X=391.5,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
* three (U+0033): X=129.0,Y=0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)
* six (U+0036): X=510.0,Y=716.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* C (U+0043): X=490.5,Y=-0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)
* C (U+0043): X=506.0,Y=712.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* G (U+0047): X=545.5,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
* a (U+0061): X=282.0,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)
* f (U+0066): X=143.0,Y=716.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* g (U+0067): X=577.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
* g (U+0067): X=386.0,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
* And 84 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]
The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:
* ampersand (U+0026): X=386.0,Y=-0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)
* four (U+0034): X=331.0,Y=716.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* four (U+0034): X=475.0,Y=716.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* six (U+0036): X=494.0,Y=716.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* C (U+0043): X=507.5,Y=712.5 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* G (U+0047): X=542.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
* G (U+0047): X=549.5,Y=712.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* c (U+0063): X=402.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
* d (U+0064): X=351.0,Y=533.0 (should be at x-height 535?)
* e (U+0065): X=435.0,Y=-0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)
* And 81 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<308.0,493.0>--<270.0,430.0>> -> L<<270.0,430.0>--<182.0,300.0>>
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<310.0,300.0>--<310.0,382.0>> -> L<<310.0,382.0>--<313.0,493.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<319.0,373.0>--<387.0,449.0>> -> L<<387.0,449.0>--<528.0,598.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<418.0,287.0>--<359.0,237.0>> -> L<<359.0,237.0>--<319.0,207.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<231.0,239.0>--<231.0,289.0>> -> L<<231.0,289.0>--<234.0,348.0>>
* uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<264.0,286.0>--<308.0,332.0>> -> L<<308.0,332.0>--<413.0,436.0>>
* And uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<338.0,215.0>--<293.0,180.0>> -> L<<293.0,180.0>--<264.0,159.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<338.0,553.0>--<302.0,493.0>> -> L<<302.0,493.0>--<152.0,280.0>>
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<340.0,280.0>--<340.0,426.0>> -> L<<340.0,426.0>--<343.0,553.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<287.0,344.0>--<366.0,433.0>> -> L<<366.0,433.0>--<540.0,622.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<398.0,313.0>--<334.0,253.0>> -> L<<334.0,253.0>--<287.0,211.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<254.0,221.0>--<254.0,314.0>> -> L<<254.0,314.0>--<257.0,391.0>>
* uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<239.0,268.0>--<289.0,321.0>> -> L<<289.0,321.0>--<421.0,455.0>>
* And uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<320.0,231.0>--<272.0,190.0>> -> L<<272.0,190.0>--<239.0,162.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<324.0,526.0>--<287.0,464.0>> -> L<<287.0,464.0>--<166.0,289.0>>
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<326.0,289.0>--<326.0,406.0>> -> L<<326.0,406.0>--<329.0,526.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<302.0,357.0>--<376.0,440.0>> -> L<<376.0,440.0>--<535.0,611.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<407.0,301.0>--<346.0,246.0>> -> L<<346.0,246.0>--<302.0,209.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<244.0,230.0>--<244.0,302.0>> -> L<<244.0,302.0>--<247.0,371.0>>
* uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<250.0,276.0>--<298.0,326.0>> -> L<<298.0,326.0>--<417.0,446.0>>
* And uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<329.0,224.0>--<282.0,185.0>> -> L<<282.0,185.0>--<250.0,161.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<396.0,677.0>--<352.0,611.0>> -> L<<352.0,611.0>--<80.0,225.0>>
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<397.0,225.0>--<397.0,518.0>> -> L<<397.0,518.0>--<399.0,677.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<199.0,319.0>--<258.0,383.0>> -> L<<258.0,383.0>--<553.0,685.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<309.0,389.0>--<249.0,328.0>> -> L<<249.0,328.0>--<199.0,278.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<308.0,498.0>--<275.0,450.0>> -> L<<275.0,450.0>--<72.0,172.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<309.0,172.0>--<309.0,381.0>> -> L<<309.0,381.0>--<311.0,498.0>>
* uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<162.0,240.0>--<209.0,289.0>> -> L<<209.0,289.0>--<429.0,509.0>>
* And uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<248.0,285.0>--<201.0,239.0>> -> L<<201.0,239.0>--<162.0,202.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<393.0,666.0>--<353.0,604.0>> -> L<<353.0,604.0>--<90.0,234.0>>
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<394.0,234.0>--<394.0,510.0>> -> L<<394.0,510.0>--<396.0,666.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<214.0,312.0>--<286.0,392.0>> -> L<<286.0,392.0>--<556.0,676.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<331.0,376.0>--<267.0,310.0>> -> L<<267.0,310.0>--<214.0,256.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<302.0,483.0>--<271.0,437.0>> -> L<<271.0,437.0>--<81.0,181.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<303.0,181.0>--<303.0,371.0>> -> L<<303.0,371.0>--<305.0,483.0>>
* uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<176.0,240.0>--<227.0,294.0>> -> L<<227.0,294.0>--<431.0,500.0>>
* And uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<265.0,275.0>--<216.0,227.0>> -> L<<216.0,227.0>--<176.0,189.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<372.0,620.0>--<338.0,563.0>> -> L<<338.0,563.0>--<120.0,258.0>>
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<373.0,258.0>--<373.0,475.0>> -> L<<373.0,475.0>--<376.0,620.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<253.0,312.0>--<343.0,415.0>> -> L<<343.0,415.0>--<553.0,648.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<376.0,342.0>--<307.0,271.0>> -> L<<307.0,271.0>--<253.0,216.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<280.0,202.0>--<280.0,341.0>> -> L<<280.0,341.0>--<283.0,438.0>>
* uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<211.0,248.0>--<267.0,308.0>> -> L<<267.0,308.0>--<429.0,475.0>>
* And uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<301.0,249.0>--<250.0,201.0>> -> L<<250.0,201.0>--<211.0,166.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<386.0,648.0>--<353.0,592.0>> -> L<<353.0,592.0>--<106.0,249.0>>
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<387.0,249.0>--<387.0,496.0>> -> L<<387.0,496.0>--<390.0,648.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<238.0,299.0>--<333.0,408.0>> -> L<<333.0,408.0>--<559.0,659.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<367.0,354.0>--<296.0,278.0>> -> L<<296.0,278.0>--<238.0,218.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<291.0,194.0>--<291.0,352.0>> -> L<<291.0,352.0>--<294.0,458.0>>
* uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<199.0,240.0>--<258.0,303.0>> -> L<<258.0,303.0>--<433.0,484.0>>
* And uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<293.0,256.0>--<240.0,206.0>> -> L<<240.0,206.0>--<199.0,167.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<356.0,589.0>--<321.0,530.0>> -> L<<321.0,530.0>--<135.0,268.0>>
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<358.0,268.0>--<358.0,453.0>> -> L<<358.0,453.0>--<361.0,589.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<269.0,327.0>--<354.0,424.0>> -> L<<354.0,424.0>--<547.0,636.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<386.0,329.0>--<320.0,262.0>> -> L<<320.0,262.0>--<269.0,214.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<268.0,211.0>--<268.0,328.0>> -> L<<268.0,328.0>--<271.0,416.0>>
* uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<224.0,257.0>--<277.0,314.0>> -> L<<277.0,314.0>--<425.0,466.0>>
* And uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<310.0,240.0>--<260.0,196.0>> -> L<<260.0,196.0>--<224.0,164.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<399.0,684.0>--<352.0,616.0>> -> L<<352.0,616.0>--<73.0,219.0>>
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<400.0,219.0>--<400.0,524.0>> -> L<<400.0,524.0>--<401.0,684.0>>
* uni13E6 (U+13E6): L<<189.0,324.0>--<239.0,376.0>> -> L<<239.0,376.0>--<552.0,692.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<313.0,508.0>--<278.0,459.0>> -> L<<278.0,459.0>--<66.0,167.0>>
* uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<314.0,167.0>--<314.0,389.0>> -> L<<314.0,389.0>--<315.0,508.0>>
* uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<153.0,240.0>--<196.0,285.0>> -> L<<196.0,285.0>--<428.0,515.0>>
* And uniABB6 (U+ABB6): L<<236.0,293.0>--<191.0,248.0>> -> L<<191.0,248.0>--<153.0,211.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* V (U+0056): B<<339.5,236.0>-<346.0,204.0>-<347.0,184.0>>/B<<347.0,184.0>-<349.0,204.0>-<354.5,235.5>> = 8.57299836361137
* W (U+0057): B<<308.0,211.5>-<313.0,185.0>-<315.0,167.0>>/B<<315.0,167.0>-<319.0,197.0>-<325.5,236.0>> = 13.934835114501363
* W (U+0057): B<<527.0,442.0>-<523.0,468.0>-<521.0,486.0>>/B<<521.0,486.0>-<519.0,468.0>-<514.5,442.0>> = 12.680383491819825
* W (U+0057): B<<714.0,235.0>-<721.0,196.0>-<724.0,167.0>>/B<<724.0,167.0>-<727.0,192.0>-<734.0,229.0>> = 12.748914526401432
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<308.0,211.5>-<313.0,185.0>-<315.0,167.0>>/B<<315.0,167.0>-<319.0,197.0>-<325.5,236.0>> = 13.934835114501363
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<527.0,442.0>-<523.0,468.0>-<521.0,486.0>>/B<<521.0,486.0>-<519.0,468.0>-<514.5,442.0>> = 12.680383491819825
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<714.0,235.0>-<721.0,196.0>-<724.0,167.0>>/B<<724.0,167.0>-<727.0,192.0>-<734.0,229.0>> = 12.748914526401432
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<308.0,211.5>-<313.0,185.0>-<315.0,167.0>>/B<<315.0,167.0>-<319.0,197.0>-<325.5,236.0>> = 13.934835114501363
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<527.0,442.0>-<523.0,468.0>-<521.0,486.0>>/B<<521.0,486.0>-<519.0,468.0>-<514.5,442.0>> = 12.680383491819825
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<714.0,235.0>-<721.0,196.0>-<724.0,167.0>>/B<<724.0,167.0>-<727.0,192.0>-<734.0,229.0>> = 12.748914526401432
* And 6 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* W (U+0057): B<<280.5,202.0>-<287.0,168.0>-<290.0,144.0>>/B<<290.0,144.0>-<294.0,179.0>-<302.5,223.0>> = 13.644818100558723
* W (U+0057): B<<506.0,484.5>-<500.0,516.0>-<498.0,534.0>>/B<<498.0,534.0>-<496.0,516.0>-<490.0,484.5>> = 12.680383491819825
* W (U+0057): B<<693.5,221.0>-<702.0,177.0>-<706.0,144.0>>/B<<706.0,144.0>-<709.0,168.0>-<715.0,202.0>> = 14.03624346792643
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<280.5,202.0>-<287.0,168.0>-<290.0,144.0>>/B<<290.0,144.0>-<294.0,179.0>-<302.5,223.0>> = 13.644818100558723
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<506.0,484.5>-<500.0,516.0>-<498.0,534.0>>/B<<498.0,534.0>-<496.0,516.0>-<490.0,484.5>> = 12.680383491819825
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<693.5,221.0>-<702.0,177.0>-<706.0,144.0>>/B<<706.0,144.0>-<709.0,168.0>-<715.0,202.0>> = 14.03624346792643
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<280.5,202.0>-<287.0,168.0>-<290.0,144.0>>/B<<290.0,144.0>-<294.0,179.0>-<302.5,223.0>> = 13.644818100558723
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<506.0,484.5>-<500.0,516.0>-<498.0,534.0>>/B<<498.0,534.0>-<496.0,516.0>-<490.0,484.5>> = 12.680383491819825
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<693.5,221.0>-<702.0,177.0>-<706.0,144.0>>/B<<706.0,144.0>-<709.0,168.0>-<715.0,202.0>> = 14.03624346792643
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<280.5,202.0>-<287.0,168.0>-<290.0,144.0>>/B<<290.0,144.0>-<294.0,179.0>-<302.5,223.0>> = 13.644818100558723
* And 5 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* V (U+0056): B<<329.0,217.5>-<335.0,187.0>-<337.0,166.0>>/B<<337.0,166.0>-<340.0,187.0>-<345.5,217.0>> = 13.570434385161475
* W (U+0057): B<<517.0,457.0>-<511.0,491.0>-<508.0,512.0>>/B<<508.0,512.0>-<506.0,491.0>-<500.0,457.0>> = 13.570434385161475
* W (U+0057): B<<705.0,216.0>-<711.0,181.0>-<714.0,155.0>>/B<<714.0,155.0>-<717.0,179.0>-<723.5,214.5>> = 13.70696100407981
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<517.0,457.0>-<511.0,491.0>-<508.0,512.0>>/B<<508.0,512.0>-<506.0,491.0>-<500.0,457.0>> = 13.570434385161475
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<705.0,216.0>-<711.0,181.0>-<714.0,155.0>>/B<<714.0,155.0>-<717.0,179.0>-<723.5,214.5>> = 13.70696100407981
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<517.0,457.0>-<511.0,491.0>-<508.0,512.0>>/B<<508.0,512.0>-<506.0,491.0>-<500.0,457.0>> = 13.570434385161475
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<705.0,216.0>-<711.0,181.0>-<714.0,155.0>>/B<<714.0,155.0>-<717.0,179.0>-<723.5,214.5>> = 13.70696100407981
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<517.0,457.0>-<511.0,491.0>-<508.0,512.0>>/B<<508.0,512.0>-<506.0,491.0>-<500.0,457.0>> = 13.570434385161475
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<705.0,216.0>-<711.0,181.0>-<714.0,155.0>>/B<<714.0,155.0>-<717.0,179.0>-<723.5,214.5>> = 13.70696100407981
* Wgrave (U+1E80): B<<517.0,457.0>-<511.0,491.0>-<508.0,512.0>>/B<<508.0,512.0>-<506.0,491.0>-<500.0,457.0>> = 13.570434385161475
* And Wgrave (U+1E80): B<<705.0,216.0>-<711.0,181.0>-<714.0,155.0>>/B<<714.0,155.0>-<717.0,179.0>-<723.5,214.5>> = 13.70696100407981 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* W (U+0057): B<<479.0,550.0>-<473.0,575.0>-<472.0,587.0>>/B<<472.0,587.0>-<471.0,575.0>-<465.5,550.0>> = 9.527283381452328
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<479.0,550.0>-<473.0,575.0>-<472.0,587.0>>/B<<472.0,587.0>-<471.0,575.0>-<465.5,550.0>> = 9.527283381452328
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<479.0,550.0>-<473.0,575.0>-<472.0,587.0>>/B<<472.0,587.0>-<471.0,575.0>-<465.5,550.0>> = 9.527283381452328
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<479.0,550.0>-<473.0,575.0>-<472.0,587.0>>/B<<472.0,587.0>-<471.0,575.0>-<465.5,550.0>> = 9.527283381452328
* And Wgrave (U+1E80): B<<479.0,550.0>-<473.0,575.0>-<472.0,587.0>>/B<<472.0,587.0>-<471.0,575.0>-<465.5,550.0>> = 9.527283381452328 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* W (U+0057): B<<684.5,198.0>-<692.0,160.0>-<695.0,130.0>>/B<<695.0,130.0>-<700.0,167.0>-<710.5,217.5>> = 13.406644859516216
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<684.5,198.0>-<692.0,160.0>-<695.0,130.0>>/B<<695.0,130.0>-<700.0,167.0>-<710.5,217.5>> = 13.406644859516216
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<684.5,198.0>-<692.0,160.0>-<695.0,130.0>>/B<<695.0,130.0>-<700.0,167.0>-<710.5,217.5>> = 13.406644859516216
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<684.5,198.0>-<692.0,160.0>-<695.0,130.0>>/B<<695.0,130.0>-<700.0,167.0>-<710.5,217.5>> = 13.406644859516216
* And Wgrave (U+1E80): B<<684.5,198.0>-<692.0,160.0>-<695.0,130.0>>/B<<695.0,130.0>-<700.0,167.0>-<710.5,217.5>> = 13.406644859516216 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* uni13B4 (U+13B4): L<<516.0,542.0>--<517.0,303.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* uni13B4 (U+13B4): L<<529.0,546.0>--<530.0,308.0>>
* And uni13BF (U+13BF): L<<148.0,588.0>--<149.0,714.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* uni13B4 (U+13B4): L<<428.0,561.0>--<429.0,247.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* uni13B4 (U+13B4): L<<444.0,549.0>--<446.0,263.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* uni13B4 (U+13B4): L<<499.0,537.0>--<501.0,298.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* exclam (U+0021): L<<100.0,174.0>--<98.0,714.0>>
* exclam (U+0021): L<<127.0,714.0>--<125.0,174.0>>
* exclamdown (U+00A1): L<<122.0,354.0>--<124.0,-186.0>>
* exclamdown (U+00A1): L<<96.0,-186.0>--<98.0,354.0>>
* uni13BF (U+13BF): L<<188.0,557.0>--<189.0,714.0>>
* uni13CE (U+13CE): L<<400.0,524.0>--<401.0,684.0>>
* uniAB8F (U+AB8F): L<<145.0,419.0>--<146.0,535.0>>
* And uniAB9E (U+AB9E): L<<314.0,389.0>--<315.0,508.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]