💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✔️ PASS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 9 | 114 | 7 | 104 |
1% | 0% | 5% | 64% | 4% | 58% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
Failed with IndexError: list index out of range
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * oiMatra_visarga.short * oiMatra_anusvara.short * oiMatra_candrabindu * nnaa_chakma.alt * oiMatra_anusvara * oiMatra_visarga * oiMatra_maayyaa * oiMatra_maayyaa.short and lhaa_chakma.below
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
Glyph 0x00A0 is called "nbspace": Change to "uni00A0" [code: not-recommended-00a0]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- tthaa.base
- And ttaa.base
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: auMatra_chakma (U+1112F) and oMatra_chakma (U+1112E) [code: mark-chars]
The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class: U+11145 and U+11146 [code: non-mark-chars]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment L<<159.0,84.0>--<159.0,80.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<613.0,293.0>-<612.0,275.0>-<612.0,267.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<612.0,267.5>-<612.0,260.0>-<612.0,257.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<177.0,626.0>--<173.0,626.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<450.0,129.0>--<454.0,129.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<176.0,593.0>--<172.0,593.0>>
* N (U+004E) contains a short segment L<<582.0,123.0>--<586.0,123.0>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<416.0,-9.0>-<410.0,-9.0>-<403.5,-9.5>>
* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<403.5,-9.5>-<397.0,-10.0>-<391.0,-10.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment B<<468.0,577.5>-<463.0,600.0>-<461.0,609.0>>
* And 86 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* naa_chakma (U+1111A): L<<497.0,418.0>--<501.0,418.0>> -> L<<501.0,418.0>--<506.0,418.0>>
* And saa_chakma (U+11125): L<<553.0,272.0>--<553.0,272.0>> -> L<<553.0,272.0>--<553.0,272.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]