💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✅ PASS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 3 | 25 | 540 | 32 | 472 |
0% | 0% | 3% | 65% | 4% | 57% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * uniA6A5
The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'
The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'
The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Bamum Medium' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Sans Bamum SemiBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
Not all fonts passed in the command line are in the same directory. This may lead to bad results as the tool will interpret all font files as belonging to a single font family. The detected directories are: ['fonts/NotoSansBamum/googlefonts/ttf', 'fonts/NotoSansBamum/googlefonts/variable-ttf'] [code: single-directory]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni00A0.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni00A0.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni00A0.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni00A0.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni00A0.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
PANOSE proportion is not the same across this family. In order to fix this, please make sure that the panose.bProportion value is the same in the OS/2 table of all of this family font files. [code: inconsistency]
PANOSE family type is not the same across this family. In order to fix this, please make sure that the panose.bFamilyType value is the same in the OS/2 table of all of this family font files. [code: inconsistency]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* W (U+0057): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* W (U+0057): B<<489.0,505.5>-<485.0,529.0>-<483.0,542.0>>/B<<483.0,542.0>-<482.0,529.0>-<477.5,505.5>> = 13.144867617550734
* W (U+0057): B<<683.0,196.0>-<689.0,161.0>-<692.0,137.0>>/B<<692.0,137.0>-<695.0,162.0>-<701.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<489.0,505.5>-<485.0,529.0>-<483.0,542.0>>/B<<483.0,542.0>-<482.0,529.0>-<477.5,505.5>> = 13.144867617550734
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<683.0,196.0>-<689.0,161.0>-<692.0,137.0>>/B<<692.0,137.0>-<695.0,162.0>-<701.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<489.0,505.5>-<485.0,529.0>-<483.0,542.0>>/B<<483.0,542.0>-<482.0,529.0>-<477.5,505.5>> = 13.144867617550734
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<683.0,196.0>-<689.0,161.0>-<692.0,137.0>>/B<<692.0,137.0>-<695.0,162.0>-<701.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* And 13 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* u16825 (U+16825): B<<480.0,311.5>-<519.0,342.0>-<567.0,344.0>>/B<<567.0,344.0>-<516.0,345.0>-<478.0,379.0>> = 3.509246744464209
* u16825 (U+16825): B<<627.5,354.5>-<605.0,345.0>-<579.0,344.0>>/B<<579.0,344.0>-<627.0,342.0>-<666.0,311.5>> = 4.588542192154558
* u1688D (U+1688D): B<<490.0,138.0>-<467.0,126.0>-<441.0,124.0>>/L<<441.0,124.0>--<638.0,124.0>> = 4.398705354995508
* u1688D (U+1688D): L<<229.0,124.0>--<427.0,124.0>>/B<<427.0,124.0>-<375.0,127.0>-<336.0,171.0>> = 3.301865674434948
* u168D1 (U+168D1): L<<266.0,243.0>--<196.0,382.0>>/L<<196.0,382.0>--<197.0,380.0>> = 0.1646425914058525
* u168E7 (U+168E7): L<<110.0,134.0>--<112.0,149.0>>/B<<112.0,149.0>-<102.0,103.0>-<100.0,50.0>> = 4.670130359300931
* And uniA6B4 (U+A6B4): B<<241.5,236.0>-<251.0,197.0>-<255.0,161.0>>/B<<255.0,161.0>-<259.0,197.0>-<268.5,238.0>> = 12.680383491819825 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* u16825 (U+16825): B<<480.0,311.5>-<519.0,342.0>-<567.0,344.0>>/B<<567.0,344.0>-<516.0,345.0>-<478.0,379.0>> = 3.509246744464209
* u16825 (U+16825): B<<627.5,354.5>-<605.0,345.0>-<579.0,344.0>>/B<<579.0,344.0>-<627.0,342.0>-<666.0,311.5>> = 4.588542192154558
* u1688D (U+1688D): B<<490.0,138.0>-<467.0,126.0>-<441.0,124.0>>/L<<441.0,124.0>--<638.0,124.0>> = 4.398705354995508
* u1688D (U+1688D): L<<229.0,124.0>--<427.0,124.0>>/B<<427.0,124.0>-<375.0,127.0>-<336.0,171.0>> = 3.301865674434948
* u168D1 (U+168D1): L<<266.0,243.0>--<196.0,382.0>>/L<<196.0,382.0>--<197.0,380.0>> = 0.1646425914058525
* u168E7 (U+168E7): L<<110.0,134.0>--<112.0,149.0>>/B<<112.0,149.0>-<102.0,103.0>-<100.0,50.0>> = 4.670130359300931
* And uniA6B4 (U+A6B4): B<<235.5,215.0>-<245.0,176.0>-<249.0,140.0>>/B<<249.0,140.0>-<253.0,176.0>-<262.0,217.5>> = 12.680383491819825 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* W (U+0057): B<<257.0,182.5>-<263.0,150.0>-<266.0,126.0>>/B<<266.0,126.0>-<269.0,151.0>-<275.0,184.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* W (U+0057): B<<678.0,182.0>-<684.0,150.0>-<687.0,126.0>>/B<<687.0,126.0>-<690.0,151.0>-<695.5,183.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<257.0,182.5>-<263.0,150.0>-<266.0,126.0>>/B<<266.0,126.0>-<269.0,151.0>-<275.0,184.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<678.0,182.0>-<684.0,150.0>-<687.0,126.0>>/B<<687.0,126.0>-<690.0,151.0>-<695.5,183.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<257.0,182.5>-<263.0,150.0>-<266.0,126.0>>/B<<266.0,126.0>-<269.0,151.0>-<275.0,184.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<678.0,182.0>-<684.0,150.0>-<687.0,126.0>>/B<<687.0,126.0>-<690.0,151.0>-<695.5,183.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<257.0,182.5>-<263.0,150.0>-<266.0,126.0>>/B<<266.0,126.0>-<269.0,151.0>-<275.0,184.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<678.0,182.0>-<684.0,150.0>-<687.0,126.0>>/B<<687.0,126.0>-<690.0,151.0>-<695.5,183.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wgrave (U+1E80): B<<257.0,182.5>-<263.0,150.0>-<266.0,126.0>>/B<<266.0,126.0>-<269.0,151.0>-<275.0,184.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wgrave (U+1E80): B<<678.0,182.0>-<684.0,150.0>-<687.0,126.0>>/B<<687.0,126.0>-<690.0,151.0>-<695.5,183.0>> = 13.967789761532726
* And 7 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<294.0,314.0>--<114.0,315.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<363.0,430.0>--<362.0,643.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<364.0,64.0>--<363.0,245.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<413.0,243.0>--<414.0,36.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<481.0,363.0>--<664.0,364.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<84.0,365.0>--<291.0,364.0>>
* uniA6B5 (U+A6B5): L<<235.0,0.0>--<234.0,249.0>>
* uniA6CD (U+A6CD): L<<211.0,0.0>--<212.0,118.0>>
* uniA6CD (U+A6CD): L<<362.0,118.0>--<361.0,0.0>>
* uniA6E6 (U+A6E6): L<<42.0,384.0>--<186.0,385.0>>
* And 5 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<294.0,314.0>--<114.0,315.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<363.0,430.0>--<362.0,643.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<364.0,64.0>--<363.0,245.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<413.0,243.0>--<414.0,36.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<481.0,363.0>--<664.0,364.0>>
* And u16807 (U+16807): L<<84.0,365.0>--<291.0,364.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<294.0,314.0>--<114.0,315.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<363.0,430.0>--<362.0,643.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<364.0,64.0>--<363.0,245.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<413.0,243.0>--<414.0,36.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<481.0,363.0>--<664.0,364.0>>
* And u16807 (U+16807): L<<84.0,365.0>--<291.0,364.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<294.0,314.0>--<114.0,315.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<363.0,430.0>--<362.0,643.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<364.0,64.0>--<363.0,245.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<413.0,243.0>--<414.0,36.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<481.0,363.0>--<664.0,364.0>>
* u16807 (U+16807): L<<84.0,365.0>--<291.0,364.0>>
* uniA6CD (U+A6CD): L<<345.0,128.0>--<344.0,0.0>>
* uniA6EB (U+A6EB): L<<330.0,287.0>--<331.0,0.0>>
* And uniA6ED (U+A6ED): L<<330.0,191.0>--<331.0,0.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]