| 💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✅ PASS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 10 | 21 | 326 | 20 | 314 |
| 1% | 2% | 4% | 61% | 4% | 59% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * u1E93D.init and u1E93D.medi
The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'
The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'
The condition FontBakeryCondition:expected_font_names had an error: KeyError: 'fvar'
This variable font does not have an avar table. [code: missing-avar]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
This is a Noto font but it lacks an ARTICLE.en_us.html file [code: missing-article]
Not all fonts passed in the command line are in the same directory. This may lead to bad results as the tool will interpret all font files as belonging to a single font family. The detected directories are: ['fonts/NotoSansAdlam/googlefonts/ttf', 'fonts/NotoSansAdlam/googlefonts/variable-ttf'] [code: single-directory]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- guillemotleft.1
- guillemotright.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- guillemotleft.1
- guillemotright.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- guillemotleft.1
- guillemotright.1
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: i̊ i̋ j̀ j́ j̃ j̄ j̈ į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ ĭ i̇ ǐ i̒ ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ ĵ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: i̊ i̋ j̀ j́ j̃ j̄ j̈ į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ ĭ i̇ ǐ i̒ ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ ĵ [code: soft-dotted]
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: i̊ i̋ j̀ j́ j̃ j̄ j̈ į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ ĭ i̇ ǐ i̒ ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĩ̧ ĭ̧ i̧̇ i̧̊ i̧̋ ǐ̧ i̧̒ ĵ [code: soft-dotted]
Interpolation issues were found in the font: - Contour order differs in glyph 'equal': [0, 1] in <fontTools.ttLib.ttGlyphSet._TTGlyphSetGlyf object at 0x7f3c2524e490>, [1, 0] in <fontTools.ttLib.ttGlyphSet._TTGlyphSetGlyf object at 0x7f3c2524e790>. [code: interpolation-issues]
The most common width is 572 among a set of 6 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 558 among a set of 2 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 557: plus
Width = 545: equal
Width = 572: divide, multiply
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
The most common width is 558 among a set of 2 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 557: plus
Width = 545: equal
Width = 572: divide, multiply
Width = 322: minus [code: width-outliers]
PANOSE proportion is not the same across this family. In order to fix this, please make sure that the panose.bProportion value is the same in the OS/2 table of all of this family font files. [code: inconsistency]
PANOSE family type is not the same across this family. In order to fix this, please make sure that the panose.bFamilyType value is the same in the OS/2 table of all of this family font files. [code: inconsistency]
Family 'Noto Sans Adlam' has 2 fonts (should be no more than 1) with the same OS/2.fsSelection bold & italic settings: Bold=False, Italic=False [code: unique-fsselection]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: acutecomb (U+0301), gravecomb (U+0300), tildecomb (U+0303), uni0302 (U+0302), uni0304 (U+0304), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni030B (U+030B) and 5 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: acutecomb (U+0301), gravecomb (U+0300), tildecomb (U+0303), uni0302 (U+0302), uni0304 (U+0304), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni030B (U+030B) and 5 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: mark-chars]
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: acutecomb (U+0301), gravecomb (U+0300), tildecomb (U+0303), uni0302 (U+0302), uni0304 (U+0304), uni0306 (U+0306), uni0307 (U+0307), uni0308 (U+0308), uni030A (U+030A), uni030B (U+030B) and 5 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: mark-chars]
The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:
* numbersign (U+0023): X=236.0,Y=713.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* numbersign (U+0023): X=343.0,Y=713.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* numbersign (U+0023): X=440.0,Y=713.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* numbersign (U+0023): X=545.0,Y=713.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* six (U+0036): X=489.0,Y=715.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* C (U+0043): X=482.0,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
* G (U+0047): X=527.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
* G (U+0047): X=543.0,Y=712.0 (should be at cap-height 714?)
* b (U+0062): X=227.0,Y=583.0 (should be at x-height 585?)
* c (U+0063): X=394.5,Y=-0.5 (should be at baseline 0?)
* 56 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* W (U+0057): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* W (U+0057): B<<489.0,505.5>-<485.0,529.0>-<483.0,542.0>>/B<<483.0,542.0>-<482.0,529.0>-<477.5,505.5>> = 13.144867617550734
* W (U+0057): B<<683.0,196.0>-<689.0,161.0>-<692.0,137.0>>/B<<692.0,137.0>-<695.0,162.0>-<701.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<489.0,505.5>-<485.0,529.0>-<483.0,542.0>>/B<<483.0,542.0>-<482.0,529.0>-<477.5,505.5>> = 13.144867617550734
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<683.0,196.0>-<689.0,161.0>-<692.0,137.0>>/B<<692.0,137.0>-<695.0,162.0>-<701.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<489.0,505.5>-<485.0,529.0>-<483.0,542.0>>/B<<483.0,542.0>-<482.0,529.0>-<477.5,505.5>> = 13.144867617550734
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<683.0,196.0>-<689.0,161.0>-<692.0,137.0>>/B<<692.0,137.0>-<695.0,162.0>-<701.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<266.0,196.0>-<272.0,161.0>-<275.0,137.0>>/B<<275.0,137.0>-<278.0,162.0>-<284.0,196.5>> = 13.967789761532726
* 5 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* u1E918 (U+1E918): L<<225.0,714.0>--<226.0,498.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* u1E918 (U+1E918): L<<174.0,714.0>--<175.0,475.0>>
* u1E91D (U+1E91D): L<<199.0,321.0>--<200.0,0.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]